Kleiman Lawyers Seize on New Evidence of Craig Wright’s ‘Fabrication’

Price Analysis

The Kleiman estate’s legal team has entered into evidence this week’s revelation that 145 addresses claimed by Craig Wright are not controlled by him.They filed a notice of supplementary evidence supporting their motion for sanctions against Wright earlier this morning, adding to their laundry list of complaints against the Satoshi-claimant.They said the new evidence further proves the “CSW Filed List” is not a list of Wright’s  Bitcoin public addresses but is instead a “purposeful fabrication” by him. The Kleiman estate is suing Wright over the Bitcoin he allegedly mined in a partnership with the late Dave Kleiman. ‘Liar and a fraud’On May 24 2020 an unknown actor posted a message, signed with the private keys to the addresses on the CSW Filed List saying:”Craig Steven Wright is a liar and a fraud. He doesn’t have the keys used to sign this message … We are all Satoshi”The coins in the addresses were all mined between May 10, 2009 and January 10, 2010, with each holding the original block reward of 50 BTC — adding up to $64 million worth combined.The Plaintiffs quoted Bitcoin expert Andreas Antonopoulos’ declaration that “You cannot sign a message in this way unless you have the private key to those addresses.”Wrong list? NopeBitcoin SV (BSV) supporters believe the message was from early Bitcoin developer Greg Maxwell, who they claim has a vendetta against Wright.BSV’s billionaire benefactor Calvin Ayre claimed the addresses are not on the official, sealed and final list:”He presented an early list that was all possible ones his could be that is public…and then later when he was clear on his he filed this in court but its sealed so not public.  No of the blocks Maxwell and other Fraudsters are using to attack Craig are on the valid sealed list.”However as the Plaintiff’s supplement makes clear, the CSW Filed List was “mistakenly” filed by them on the public docket — giving the unknown actor access to them — and the 145 addresses are indeed on it.The motion contains an extensive footnote on this, presumably in case the court felt this “mistake” was a little too convenient to be believable.Wright has the keysThe Plaintiffs had already argued the list was a “forgery intended to deceive Plaintiffs and this Court, and that Wright created it to avoid sanctions pursuant to this Court’s Order”They said the new evidence further proves this list is “not an accurate listing of Wright’s Bitcoin,and that he is still hiding the true list from Plaintiffs and the Court.””Said simply, Wright represented these 145 addresses were part of his Bitcoin holdings and were locked in an inaccessible encrypted file. This week, the person that actually controls  the private keys to those addresses used those private keys … thus proving the addresses do not belong to Wright.”While the new evidence was seized upon by many on Crypto Twitter as demonstrating once and for all Wright is not Satoshi, that’s not the position of the Kleiman team.They still believe he has access to considerable BTC wealth and demand a share of it based on Wright’s alleged partnership with Dave Kleiman in mining the BTC. Last week they argued that Wright has access to the BTC holdings in question.Plot twistDespite Antonopoulos’ evidence the person who signed the message had access to the private key, Decrypt today quoted Bitcoin developer Rene Pickhardt as saying that it was still possible the addresses had been exploited:  “Of course security might be compromised and the signatures could only be created for this particular message but not for potential coin transfers.”